Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 1981 - 2000
of 182,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2022, 3:45 pm
City of New Haven: [T]he Columbus statue is government speech and, as such, AIW has no cognizable free speech interest in it. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 8:10 am
The case arises out of a civil forfeiture action brought by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, and it is interesting to think about the lawyering that would have been involved. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
You can access yesterday’s interesting ruling of the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2007, 5:09 am
But it certainly won't end the CSPI's attempt to achieve via litigation what it can't through regulation; Hoyte's claim failed only because D.C. courts have narrowly interpreted the badly-drafted D.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:49 am
When that happens, don’t just give up, but don’t simply dash off to file an appeal on your own, either. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 11:42 am
This isn’t Wyoming’s first foray into crypto. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:12 am
Today's Lorain (OH) Morning Journal reports that public school nurse Maria T. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 3:35 pm
It's an interesting scenario to ponder from an ethics point of view. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:37 am
In addition, the case, which has a complicated procedural history given the actions of the private adoption agency, provides an interesting analysis of what is a “final order” in an ICWA case and a discussion of the collateral order doctrine: Under the circumstances presented here, we conclude the district court’s order permitting a deviation from ICWA’s placement preferences did not dispose of the entire merits of the case and left open the… [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:07 am
There’s a lot of data that would tip analysts to a money supply growing unexpectedly rapidly, which means that interest rates on government debt would rise too fast for the inflation to do much good. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 11:23 am
The GOP elite, with better political science analysis, would know it doesn't like where the voter's head is, but it couldn't solve the problem by stating the correct location. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:01 pm
By a facsimile letter of 22 April 2009, the appellant requested an extension of time for filing the appellant's comments on the Board's communication. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm
Second, the government’s case for a “compelling state interest” is exceptionally weak. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:37 pm
Maybe you don’t want to quit your law firm and move to Nepal. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The boards of appeal thus retain discretion, as a review instance, to refuse new material including requests (claim sets) not submitted during opposition proceedings (T 240/04 [16.2], T 1705/07 [8.4]). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm
The BBC’s director of news and current affairs has told a High Court judge that journalists had a public interest responsibility to cover a police search of Sir Cliff Richard’s home. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:13 am
You’d first need to prove a company was guilty under (say) s1(1) http://bit.ly/r740co which mightn’t be easy. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
The message to take from all this is "don't panic! [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:27 am
I can't see that there's anything there. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:22 pm
Interesting Concept.Will it get built? [read post]
