Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/503(d) “Real property and business interests acquired after marriage are presumed to be marital property unless they were purchased with nonmarital funds. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am by Jacob Fishman
We end the Article by analyzing the meaning of “predecessor in interest” for purposes of Rule 804(b)(1), and also whether exculpatory grand jury testimony is admissible against the government under that same rule. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am by Carolina Attorneys
Because the Defendant was living at the residence with his cousin, his cousin’s girlfriend and a minor child only the common areas of the house and Defendant’s bedroom were searched initially. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:05 am by Norman L. Eisen
Keith Davidson—Davidson, Clifford’s lawyer, is “Lawyer B” in the statement of facts. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Steven Boutwell
What are the terms of the loan (initial deferment, repayment term, interest rate, collateral, personal guaranty, bank fees)? [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:10 am
So if I get out of line, you'll hear a chunk against my head, and we'll have some interesting podcast. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm by familoo
(see Sexual Offences Act 2003) I’ve edited some words with asterisks just to avoid some p*rn alarm going off on the interwebs At least you’d think. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
On remand, the Fifth Circuit, over a strongly worded dissent by Judge Garza, again sided with the university, holding that the school’s program is narrowly tailored to fulfill a compelling interest in fostering diversity. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:05 am by Kelly Buchanan
That by reason of his occupation his calling-up for military service is contrary to the public interest: (d.) [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:04 am by Tom Goldstein
  Beyond that, the candidate must be (a) female, (b) a Democrat, (c) reasonably well known to the President’s advisors, (d) between the age of forty-two and fifty-two, (e) a lawyer (so no Susan Rice), (f) have substantial interest and experience in the kinds of issues that the Supreme Court decides (so no Samantha Power), and (g) have sufficient credentials. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Was it really the case that 2 U.S.C section 441(b), the law at issue in the case, is all that was preserving our democracy? [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am by Maria Roche
  The evidence is that there are generally fewer hearings where both parties are represented  [§96(b)] and hearings are less likely to overrun [§96(h)]. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
There, the president needed merely to find that admitting those immigrants would be detrimental to U.S. interests, a standard satisfied, Roberts concluded, despite concerns that the order violated the Establishment Clause of the Constitution. [read post]