Search for: "In Re Kennedy" Results 1981 - 2000 of 4,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Quoting an amicus brief, Halliburton’s counsel elaborated:  “Outside of [the Second Circuit] . . . they’re as rare as hen’s teeth. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:31 pm
John Ruggie is Berthold Beitz Professor in Human Rights and International Affairs at Harvard’s Kennedy School _________________"An Institutional Role for Civil Society Within the U.N. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Natalie Punchak
 In the case of job losses, to what extent does the analysis include re-employment somewhere? [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
  Our Jason Knott weighed in with two excellent, in-depth pieces examining both the majority opinion as well as the concurring and dissenting opinions (including the very unusual dissenting lineup of Sotomayor, Kennedy, and Alito). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm by Joe Patrice
The spirit of Kennedy lives on! [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:01 am by SHG
They must know what they’re doing, or no one would elect them. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:35 am by David Markus
  Justices Ginsburg and Scalia celebrate Verdi:When Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is waiting patiently for his spoonful of rigatoni and scallops, too, you know you’re in for a real Italian party. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
I’m not quite sure what words we’re going to give the District Court if you’re to prevail. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
And since we’re just as Justice Kennedy pointed out dealing with adjectives, you know meritless, frivolous, exceptional why don’t give some deference to their judgment? [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 5:34 am by Amy Howe
  He observes that “[p]rivacy advocates can hope that the Massachusetts ruling helps prompt the justices to re-interpret past decisions to catch up with the realities of privacy-invasive 21st century technology. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:31 am by Wells Bennett
 We’re talking big-time unfairness here, your honor. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:07 am by Jane Chong
It’s bad news if you’re not a fan of prison litigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am by Laura Sandwell
Kennedy v The Charity Commission, heard 29 – 31 October 2013. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:00 am by Brad Spangler
The tension between the two groups a representative must deal with (his/her constituency and the people at the table) makes it difficult for him or her to maintain trust and respect at both ends.During the consensus building or negotiating process, representatives must be flexible and continually re-evaluate where they stand on the issue as they learn more about it. [read post]