Search for: "In re: AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,915
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm by Guest Blogger
But what we’re basically saying to people making less than 400% FPL . . .don’t worry about it. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 10:20 am
And he is proclaiming a new, uniquely American right to pre-emptively attack whomsoever he may deem represents a potential future threat. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Furthermore, that process fails as a means of providing effective or legitimate legal review of administrative action. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am by Sasha Volokh
We could call all these doctrines "nondelegation doctrines," but we shouldn't let the similar nomenclature confuse us into thinking that they're the same doctrine. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
  As far as we can tell it has not yet prevailed in any product liability action. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm by Ken Klukowski
Many scholars and commentators are urban elites clustered far to the left of the fifty-yard line of American society and historical norms, living in an echo-chamber. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:01 am by Scott R. Anderson
By this point in 2021, Donald Trump will, unless re-elected, no longer be president. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Danielle Citron
  For instance, Turner’s website also urged readers to murder “illegal aliens”: “We’re going to have to start killing these people. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 11:53 am by Eugene Volokh
This is why, by the way, careful commentators try to distinguish "the First Amendment," which is a legal rule binding American government entities (as to religion as well as speech), from "free speech" or "religious freedom," which are broader sets of principles that may apply to others as well. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Whether you find palatable the final recipe that eventually emerges from the simmering debate depends on which side of the food industry aisle you’re sitting, on what happens in the Second Circuit, and ultimately on what Congress does with it. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:27 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Whether you find palatable the final recipe that eventually emerges from the simmering debate depends on which side of the food industry aisle you’re sitting, on what happens in the Second Circuit, and ultimately on what Congress does with it. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Ciaran Martin
Similarly, the actions of pro-Ukrainian actors in defacing and taking down Russian websites may embarrass the Kremlin but hardly merit the much misused term of “cyberwar. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:42 pm by Kenneth Anderson
The Bush administration, and even more aggressively the Obama administration, embraced an extraordinary principle: that the United States can send this robotic weapon over borders to kill perceived enemies, even American citizens, who are viewed as a threat. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:48 pm by Kenneth Anderson
The Bush administration, and even more aggressively the Obama administration, embraced an extraordinary principle: that the United States can send this robotic weapon over borders to kill perceived enemies, even American citizens, who are viewed as a threat. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Guest Blogger
” Beyond the individual clauses and their interpretation—but way, way short of some ethereal Dworkinian principle—there’s the constitutional structure and its logic (or “genius,” as John Marshall used to say). [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Tribe, American Constitutional Law 513 (2d ed.1988) ("[A]bsent explicit congressional consent no state may command federal officials … to take action in derogation of their … federal responsibilities"). [read post]