Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 1981 - 2000 of 18,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Alan Rozenshtein
In addition, he quotes Justice Scalia’s opinion in Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:10 am
O.K., come back when you’re done, and read this nitpicking of the Court’s rationale. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
    I realize I never posted anything about the California Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
  It just got two new justices -- Justices DeSantos and Snauffer -- in August. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 11:03 am
EPA, No. 05-1120 [On the Docket / Medill] Justices' First Brush With Global Warming [New York Times] Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
As to her estate, Plaintiff testified on re-direct and re-cross concerning her purchase of a rental property for roughly $95,000 with money loaned to her by a friend. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:30 pm
  As long as you're largely concerned only about the particular words used -- which admittedly seem phrased in categorical language -- and not the equity or justice of the result. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve pretty much just described the circumstances present in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], a post-trial decision handed down earlier this month by Albany County Commercial Division Justice Richard M. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm by Lawrence Solum
Justice Scalia’s rigid, formalistic approach to testimonial statements in Davis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am by Orin Kerr
At the same time that the individual mandate was being enacted in Congress, the Supreme Court heard a very signifiicant case on the Necessary and Proper Clause, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Polls, not chancy politics of Justice-watching, represent surest hope for gay-marriage supporters [me in New York Daily News] “A reasonably good week for the Fourth Amendment” [Jonathan Blanks, Cato on Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
  It may well be that the justices were disgusted by the defendant -- understandably so -- and were repulsed that he was able to rape someone through the use of his religious authority. [read post]