Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2009, 11:03 am
This requires a little background: In 1992, Allstate, evidently tired of its "You're in good hands" image, decided it needed to toughen up. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:27 am
You're not at the center of their universe, they are. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:20 pm
We're down to eight firms in our 2009 March Madness for Law Firms. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Sullivan, 2009 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:01 am
Excellent article by Paul Sullivan of the NY TimesSmaller Though It May Be, It's Time to Look at the EstateFor all the upheaval that has attended Barack Obama's presidency so far, at least one initiative has caused little commotion: a proposal to extend the estate tax at the current level.Estate planning is not primarily about avoiding a tax that few have been subject to since it was instituted in 1916. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 7:43 pm
Below is the story from the Oregonian’s Julie Sullivan: The soldiers worried about Saddam Hussein loyalists, not the dust. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Either: (a) massive litigations will not be pursued because they're too complicated, uncertain, protracted, and expensive; and/or (b) if they must be pursued, contract attorneys, staff attorneys, and outsourcers will provide the human throw-weight needed for massive document review; and/or (c) corporations will simply insist that document review be completed for flat fees of $X/unit [$1.00/page? [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:44 am
.' Search guru Danny Sullivan told the audience at last week's Search Marketing Expo he's real big on Twitter search. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
Sullivan Jr., a partner in Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
We're glad to see some newer ASAs are reading the blog. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:14 pm
Mike Sullivan says the proximity-based employment and residential restrictions create a false sense of public safety. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:43 am
We posted about Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:42 pm
Even the devil deserves his due, at least if we're going to pretend to live in a nation of laws. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 9:30 am
No one ever got sacked for hiring Cravath, Wachtell or Sullivan & Cromwell and losing miserably. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:59 am
Sullivan, who presided over the Stevens trial in Federal District Court here, has called a hearing Friday to consider a request by Mr. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
But the longer and more involved the cover-up becomes, the more deeply implicated you get -- not only in the cover-up, but in the original misdeeds that you're concealing as well. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:06 pm
Kate McCarthy and Andrew Sullivan contributed to this report. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:47 am
(I know what you're thinking: Charleston one day, Glen Burnie the next; is there no end to the excitement? [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:28 am
They’re on the good end of the deal. [read post]
