Search for: "In the Matter of Anderson" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2011, 10:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  Although fact finders may use such evidence to determine if a fee is reasonable, these particular details are not required to establish a reasonable attorney’s fee as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 9:36 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) So how should the outcome of the Durban conference, the UN’s latest climate change confab, be interpreted? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kenneth Anderson
That is, the NDAA should not be read to express views on such questions one way or the other, but rather the matter if litigated should be decided under the original AUMF just as it would have been absent the NDAA. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:11 pm by Jon Sham
Anderson most recently was a legal honors clerk and attorney advisor at the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
” Ryan Chiromas at IPWatchDog and Jonas Anderson at PatentlyO also summarize the arguments in Mayo, while JURIST‘s Andrea Bottorff has coverage of oral argument in both Mayo and PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Prometheus Oral Argument -For a great summary of the big patent case of the week, check out this post by Patently-O guest author Jonas Anderson, Assistant Professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Prometheus Oral Argument -For a great summary of the big patent case of the week, check out this post by Patently-O guest author Jonas Anderson, Assistant Professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:25 am by Rantanen
Guest Post by Jonas Anderson, Assistant Professor at American University Washington College of Law Yesterday morning I attended the highly anticipated oral argument in Mayo v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Charles Lane being the New Republic editor at the time of Glass’s principal “fabulisms. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:38 am by Kenneth Anderson
For better or worse, the Senate version is explicitly agnostic as to these matters. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 9:44 am by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
Our experienced trial attorneys are committed to defending your rights in any and all personal injury matters. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:52 am by Rick Hasen
 Isn’t the reason for voting this way or that an entirely private matter? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:24 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“We prosecute by one criteria, but we report by another criteria,” Steve Anderson, chief of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, told The New York Times. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:32 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:17 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:17 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition and OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
  The Court, however, found that those cases address CAFA’s class action provisions and not its mass action provisions, and as the courts in Anderson and Tanoh recognized, Freeman involved a different matter, namely, an attempt by the same class of plaintiffs to split their lawsuits into “completely arbitrary” time periods, with each suit claiming under $5 million, in order to creatively avoid CAFA’s $5 million threshold. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
  The Court, however, found that those cases address CAFA’s class action provisions and not its mass action provisions, and as the courts in Anderson and Tanoh recognized, Freeman involved a different matter, namely, an attempt by the same class of plaintiffs to split their lawsuits into “completely arbitrary” time periods, with each suit claiming under $5 million, in order to creatively avoid CAFA’s $5 million threshold. [read post]