Search for: "JOHN DOE #2" Results 1981 - 2000 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2021, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
ShareChief Justice John Roberts began his 2021 year-end report, as he so often does, with an anecdote from history to set the stage. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am
TTAB Issued 36 Precedential Opinions in 2016Text John L. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 3:56 am
Ouellette, "Does Running Out Of (Some) Trademarks Matter? [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Plaintiff and John Doe 2 arrived at the room and John Doe 2 was immediately summoned in and physically assaulted by Carver and Bennett. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
Although applicant’s gin does not originate in the technical City of London (i.e., within the boundaries of the financial district subdivision of London), it does originate in London. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:30 am
The Board concluded that Gottlieb Daimler is at best a "semi-historical" figure and does not eclipse its surname significance.Gottlieb DaimlerAs to the fourth factor, the Board ruled that DAIMLER has the "look-and-feel" of a surname. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm by Gene Quinn
John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court The latest edition of Fortune magazine has John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, on the cover. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
AND… so does John Bolch at Family Lore……with a card  from Venal & Grabbit, Solicitors Meanwhile…. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:53 pm
Cleaning Service Franchisees Qualify as “Employees” Under Massachusetts LawThis posting was written by John W. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:01 pm
"In conclusion, the Board found the mark to be primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive, and it affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
Fisher, the Supreme Court’s first case decided under that clause (2 Cranch at 396). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Tom Casagrande
But dividing 4-4, it was able only to issue a non-precedential affirmance.Today, a 2-1 majority of the 2d Circuit in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]