Search for: "Juri v. Juri"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 46,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2010, 4:53 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:21 am
After deliberating for less than a day, the jury sends the judge a note... [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Foster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Foster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Foster v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
Louis IM & S v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Virginia Faletti v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:03 am
The jury also awarded damages in excess of $1.1 billion. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:00 am
This trend held true in the motorcycle accident case of Edward Utterback, Janette Simons v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:00 am
This trend held true in the motorcycle accident case of Edward Utterback, Janette Simons v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:51 pm
Op. at 43, quoting State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:00 pm
The Court of Appeals says the trial court was wrong and defendant's counsel cannot argue jury nullification.The case is United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Tenth Circuit reinstates conviction after concluding FRE 606(b) exceptions did not apply and Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury was not violated; Tenth Circuit notes circuit split on whether allegations of juror misconduct on dishonesty during voir dire may be considered, in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 9:12 pm
by Dennis Crouch In the Oracle v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Amir Sitafalwalla v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:42 pm
Part V concludes that the U.S. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 4:45 am
It was apparent that the complex law of patent infringement and the overwhelming jury instructions made it all but impossible for the Apple v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 7:34 am
The post GRADY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Kimble v. [read post]
