Search for: "L. Martin" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn Justice for All: Earl Warren and the Nation He Made by Jim Newton Civility: Manners, Morals and the Etiquette of Democracy by Stephen L. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:38 am by Jennifer Lipinski
Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn Justice for All: Earl Warren and the Nation He Made by Jim Newton Civility: Manners, Morals and the Etiquette of Democracy by Stephen L. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:25 pm by David Ingram
Also this year, the Senate Ethics Committee brought in K&L Gates partner Carol Elder Bruce to help conclude its investigation into then-Sen. [read post]
So without denying that appreciation for dramatic excitement can help explain why officials should give the competitors somewhat greater slack during moments of high drama, we have reason to look for an alternative account too.A second answer, recently advanced by Chicago economist Tobias Moskowitz and SI columnist L. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" says peter martin http://j.mp/n5RMTT landmark decision from the european court of justice: "Intermediary liability: because you’re worth it (L’Oreal v eBay)" http://j.mp/pkZI00 reviewing all eight harry potter films: "Harry Potter films: Alfonso Cuarón saved J.K. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 10:54 am by law shucks
Former London managing partner Martin Thomas and fellow corporate partner Dearbhla Quigley, meanwhile, left to join Chadbourne & Parke’s City office. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:14 am
There's a lot more to this interview, but you have to read between the lines, because Martin speaks in that diplomatic, bureaucratic way. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
Running really late, in part due to a large number of opinions. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by Randy Barnett
More than once, and quite often in separation-of-powers cases, the Court has said that a ‘[l]ack of historical precedent can indicate a constitutional infirmity’” in a congressional act. [read post]