Search for: "Labelle v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 8,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
He makes a great point out of the warning labels, the FDA review and all the precautions taken to avoid the injury that Ms. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:47 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
We’ve just read Lyman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Those cases generally rely on an assertion of copyright protection over the goods’ packaging or labels, rather than the good itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
Rogers v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 5:35 am
Mazda Motor State. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:53 am
Taking [plaintiff’s] allegations as true, state law imposed on the Manufacturers a duty to attach a safer label to their generic [drug]. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:37 am
Gate Gourmet, Inc. followed substantial confusion resulting from a 2012 opinion from the Washington State Court of Appeals, Short v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
Indeed in December 2003, Amnesty International went so far as to label the use of special advocates a “perversion of justice”. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
Ct. at 1011 ("the MDA would pre-empt a jury determination that the FDA-approved labeling for a [device] violated a state common-law requirement for additional warnings"). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:46 am
In a recent reported (precedential) decision, Rothstein v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm
— (2009) and Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Cisneros v. [read post]
