Search for: "Land v. People" Results 1981 - 2000 of 4,711
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm by Alfred Brophy
Probably most people these days start property with Johnson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
It touches on modern land claims agreements, the Constitution Act, 1982, and the Penner Report. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
With so many long-suffering people now experiencing the unfamiliar (and probably uncomfortable) sensation of joy, it falls to the experts at Relist Watch to spring into action and bring back the reassuring embrace of disappointment. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
They claimed compensation under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, alleging depreciation in the value of their homes due to noise and other nuisance from the road. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm by NL
They claimed compensation under Part 1 of the Land Compensation Act 1973, alleging depreciation in the value of their homes due to noise and other nuisance from the road. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
A murder defendant from the land of weird facial hair and frumpy clothing complained that jurors did not check a box on a verdict form to confirm that the aggravating factors they found outweighed the mitigating ones. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:17 pm by John Culhane
In one case, Goddard v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 5:55 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
With the Supreme Court poised to rip away a constitutional right that’s been the law of the land for nearly half a century by overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
The climate change crisis challenges people throughout the world to invent and implement innovative ways to mitigate and thwart climate changing causes and effects. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by Patrick
 The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]