Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2020, 7:48 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 598 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:53 am
Supreme Court in Kercheval v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 2:41 pm
United States (courtesy of Pacific Legal Foundation). [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:22 am
Roberts v Lawton dealt with historic rentcharges of the type used in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century to secure continuing payments to the original seller of freehold land after the land was sold. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:32 am
On the following day, March 27th, the Court will conduct hearings on the second case, United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
Digging deeper to protect tribal property interests: United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information, and Cyan v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
On February 21, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari for Lozman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
But through the magic of technology the “whole world is a stage” and actors turned politicians, and politicians turned actors are acutely aware that there is more power in the scene itself than in the triggering effect of signaling words and phrases (with apologies for the descent into the land of cliché). [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:21 am
In language codified as part of the Refugee Act of 1980, Congress authorized asylum claims by any foreign national “physically present in the United States or at a land border or port of entry” (emphasis added). [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
United States offered the narrower interpretation (head and land taxes), but the holding can be reconciled plausibly (although not perfectly) with our interpretation, while most other Supreme Court cases on the Direct Tax Clause align with our reading. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:40 am
Paul, Minnesota, alleging violations of its rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), as well as its rights under the constitutions of Minnesota and the United States, including the First Amendment. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
” Morton v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
