Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
Russian President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
Both were professors at the University of Cambridge but in different departments so that the argument might be characterised as Economics v Land Economy. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
Demand for places was far greater than supply, so Eleonora is running the event again on 23 September, in the offices of London-based law firm RPC. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Takeda had sought an application stating that Mylan was infringing its patented acid-reflux drug Dexilant [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:36 pm
They are not the only London council to consider five years residence requirement – so are LB Southwark – but their stated reason for the increase is specifically because: Increased costs in inner London combined with restrictions on housing benefit has resulted in more households moving to outer London boroughs like Barnet. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:37 am
" State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 5:44 am
While the statement of reasons in this case gives a clear basis for the decision, there is no address to the Upper Tribunal case of TD v SSWP and London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames (HB) 2013 UKUT 642 AAC or the finding on the meaning of ‘occupy’ in the regulations in R (Marchant) v Swale Borough Council HBRB [2000] 1 FLR 246. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:33 am
The LOU provided for London Arbitration before a three-man Tribunal, stating in part: “we confirm that the Ship Owners agree that the above mentioned claims shall be subject to London Arbitration … and English Law to apply … and for each party to nominate its own arbitrator and the two so appointed may appoint a third”. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm
The Financial Times, based in London, is reporting on it. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK By ERIC T. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:45 am
"Read the decision at: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am
Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 8:15 am
Since the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:21 pm
Guest Post by Thomas Leonard of Kilburn & Strode LLP, London The Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has issued his opinion in C-364/131, and in doing so has provided hope for the patentability of embryonic stem cells in Europe. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
Then along came Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46 on 23 July. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
The Fashionista blog predicts that this is unlikely to be the end of the story, with a further appeal here and/or further proceedings in the United States unless the parties can use yesterday’s judgment to form the basis of a coexistence agreement. [read post]
