Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
Einer Elhauge, has stated:  “Dozens of empirical studies have now confirmed this economic reality that common shareholding alters corporate behavior. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
  Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't  absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of  Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:25 am by Joy Waltemath
Company-wide information was relevant and the requests were not overly broad because Petco had a centralized corporate decision-making team for all employees’ FMLA or ADA requests (Donlin v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:57 am
In his dissenting opinion, Justice Smith disagreed with the majority's holding that, in effect, Insurance Law § 3205(b) displaced the common law, and eliminated the exception recognized in late 19th and early 20th century United States Supreme Court cases to the rule of free assignability. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
It examines a wide range of issue areas, from the relationship of state and indigenous orders to the regulation of global financial markets, from corporate social responsibility to struggles over human rights. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The majority claims that corporate law might provide a brake on the ability of corporations to invoke religious beliefs; but if a company does decide, through its internal processes, that it is a sincere believer in any particular religion, then there is nothing in Hobby Lobby that would prevent the corporation from being covered by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
 The Florida Supreme Court considered this arbitrary and capricious constraint as unconstitutional under both the Florida and United States Constitutions. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]