Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,672
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Since there isn’t any form of coordination in California, except for all purposes, Corber goes a long way to eliminating this practice in the nation’s largest state. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:44 am by assoulineberlowe
After this seminar, on December 22, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia – in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am by Christopher Simon
Forest City Commercial Management, Inc., a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-310Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: Whether, having invalidated the only mechanism the IRS had developed for pursuing refunds of long distance telephone excise taxes unlawfully exacted from individuals, corporations, and non-profit entities between February 28, 2003 and July 31, 2006, the District Court was… [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 5:31 am by Hanni Fakhoury and Jamie Lee Williams
That’s why EFF filed a “friend of the court” brief in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
Henley’s name in a transformative nature invoking the protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution” and that “the advertisement is obviously a joke. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:00 pm
Aug. 13, 2010) The present posture of the case is that Ultramercial is again appealing from the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The doctrine is derived from Article I of the Constitution, which says that, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. . . . [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In Wallace v United Grain Growers Ltd., 1997 CanLII 332, the Court stated that one additional factor is whether the dismissed employee had been induced to leave previous secure employment. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]