Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2019, 7:05 am
In Matter of W.K. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:48 pm
State of Kerala quoted Lord Reid to say, “.. there was a time when it was almost indecent to suggest that judges make law- they only declare it. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
The question was also not addressed by the House of Lords. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:53 am
One was set aside on appeal (Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Y, the defendant in X v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:56 am
The doctrine of election was discussed by Lord Blackburn in the decision of the House of Lords in Benjamin Scarf vs. [read post]
27 May 2013, 10:02 am
Lancaster, in Clark v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:37 am
By overwhelming vote, the European Court agreed, quoting with approval lengthy excerpts from the opinions by the British Law Lords. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Although Gandy v Jubber was settled before the judgment was pronounced it has been treated as good authority in subsequent cases, including by the House of Lords in Monk. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
The House of Lords in O’Rourke v Camden LBC (1998) AC 188, and the court of appeal in X v Hounslow found no duty of care in Part VII and Part VI Housing Act 1996 obligations, or their previous equivalents. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
As long as it is readily identifiable in that search, it appears that this should form part of the CGK.The traditional approachMore fundamentally, the approach in Teva is stated as an updating of traditional guidance from the authorities, but one can question whether those authorities are characterised correctly. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
Khaira v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Our starting place is Entick v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Relying greatly on Lord Langdale’s analysis in Lewis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Nevertheless, on the present state of the law, the technique is legal. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
Lord Hodge gave the leading judgment with whom Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones agreed. [read post]
