Search for: "MATTER OF A R" Results 1981 - 2000 of 114,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2011, 7:30 am by Elie Mystal
About a week ago, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to the American Bar Association, essentially asking the organization to explain its lack of institutional control over law schools.Well, the ABA has now responded. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:27 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Focus Areas: PrivacyAttachments: 2018-12-18 [58] R&R & Order Reassign to Dist Judge.pdfRelated Projects: Crypto Policy ProjectRelated Cases/Proceedings: In Re: Petition of Jennifer Granick and Riana Pfefferkorn [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 8:43 am by Russell Knight
R. 201(b) “The purposes of litigation are best served when each party knows as much about the controversy as is reasonably practicable. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the court ruled that a Defendant landowner, CBK Mountain Adventures was entitled to summary judgment in a slip and fall matter. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by Heather Donkers
The post Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 first appeared on Robichaud's Criminal Lawyers. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 6:08 pm by Glenn Reynolds
PROFESSOR JACOBSON: David Brock of Media Matters Issues A Challenge, And I Challenge Back. [read post]
Because just like a perfectly tuned guitar, legal matters are best when they’re in harmony. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 9:38 pm
But Oprah's statement about the matter reeks with hypocrisy. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:13 am by Rees Morrison
One question on a survey of general counsel asked them to rate 19 factors that might bear on their hiring decision for major matters. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:48 am by Rees Morrison
Early next year, General Counsel Metrics will produce a breakthrough analysis of matter management software (MMS) in light of law department benchmark metrics. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:03 am by Jack Torbet
’ There are few cases in the repertoire of the Supreme Court as important as R v Horncastle. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
(See R 1/08 to R 22/10).Therefore, even if assuming for the sake of argument that the petitioner were right, this could not alter the fact, that an erroneous statement in the reasons for the decision of a Board of Appeal does not, as a matter of principle, qualify as a ground in the exhaustive list of grounds for review pursuant to A 112a.[5] Hence the present petition for review is clearly unallowable and must be rejected as such.To download the whole decision, click… [read post]