Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 42,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 4:28 pm
The FCC repealed the ownership rules after it compiled “extensive evidence regarding the changed media landscape. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division ruled that dismissal of one or more Charges and, or, specification set out in a §75 disciplinary action required remanding the matter to the appointing authority for reconsideration of the disciplinary penalty imposed on the employee.The appointing authority filed disciplinary charges against an employee [Petitioner] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division ruled that dismissal of one or more Charges and, or, specification set out in a §75 disciplinary action required remanding the matter to the appointing authority for reconsideration of the disciplinary penalty imposed on the employee.The appointing authority filed disciplinary charges against an employee [Petitioner] pursuant to Civil Service Law §75. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:31 pm
This was reiterated in a recent New York pediatric malpractice case in which the court ruled that the plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to allow the plaintiff to prove liability as a matter of law. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
Courts view that as extrinsic evidence of collateral matters. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
Courts view that as extrinsic evidence of collateral matters. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
Courts view that as extrinsic evidence of collateral matters. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
Courts view that as extrinsic evidence of collateral matters. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 1:24 pm
Courts view that as extrinsic evidence of collateral matters. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:57 am
A matter for appeal would be whether the court erred in denying the motion to suppress and allow the evidence to be used at trial. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:31 pm
Seeking the court's intervention in a discovery matter can be a rather lengthy process. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Appellant argues in his sole issue on appeal that legally insufficient evidence supports his conviction because the State did not introduce any evidence establishing that he was at the complainant's home on the date of the robbery. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 1:24 pm
Instead, they decided that the court could resolve the remaining issue as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 1:24 pm
Instead, they decided that the court could resolve the remaining issue as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:59 am
However, looking to the First Circuit’s recent DOMA ruling, Judge Jones explained the she would apply rational basis review as informed by the “pattern” evident in Romer v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:17 am
No matter, because Watkins’ defamation claim failed for other reasons. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am
But it’s one thing to make an a priori determination that we won’t apply the exclusionary rule in certain cases, and an entirely different matter to argue that we should make an ad hoc determination whether to apply it in every case, trying to decide whether the police officer’s conduct crossed the blurry line of “negligence” into “gross negligence,” and where the balance lies between the societal costs and deterrent benefits of imposing… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:59 am
As such, the district court erred as a matter of law. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:23 pm
Did the claimant have a direct interest in the subject matter? [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
While this opportunity might have been realized through a less restricted cross-examination of M.A.D.C., the information also could have been presented in a stipulation on the matter. [read post]
