Search for: "Matter of Kennedy"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 4,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2021, 3:10 pm
Kennedy Jr., sees the big picture: Defrauding taxpayer funded health care programs such as Medicare hurts not only taxpayers but our nation’s entire healthcare system. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 10:34 am
In Kennedy v. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
According to Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, a person who has "lawful possession and control" of a car will generally have Fourth Amendment rights in it. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
A parenting schedule may be created in a way that is aimed at reducing conflict (see Churchill v Kennedy, 2009 NSSC 309). [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
But that is because a citizen will naturally feel obliged to comply with such a legal duty, no matter the sanction. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
” Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority, and citing Diamond v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 5:55 am
Kennedy. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
”Justice Kennedy then translated his populist observations about jury service into constitutional doctrine by tapping into the voting discrimination framework. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm
ANTHONY KENNEDY, associate justice, U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:39 am
The Confrontation Clause is not a matter of convenience, he continued; instead, it requires cross-examination to make sure statements are reliable. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
Kennedy explained it this way. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy had not yet thrown in the towel. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 9:34 am
Kennedy and David H. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Hodges and Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm
Here Justice Kennedy’s concurrence, and critical vote to form the majority, complicates analysis. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
Texas, a 2003 Kennedy opinion striking down a law against homosex [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:15 pm
Justice Kennedy And Judicial Takings Standards Justice Kennedy inquired about what standards the federal courts could apply to tell whether a state court decision works a taking. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
Bopp, however, did not appear to have the full support of Kennedy for confining the inquiry into political advertising's nature by focusing only on the words. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The Court pointedly refused to allow the government (or the principal dissent) to substitute its own view of these matters for that of Hobby Lobby, and made clear that the only role for the Court in this context is to confirm that the asserted beliefs are sincerely held. [read post]
