Search for: "Matthews v. State" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 3:43 am by INFORRM
But Mr Johnson said his colleague had “made an assumption” and that he had not stated his information came from police. [read post]
The decisions come as abortion rights throughout the US are in flux and jeopardy after the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Matthew Larosiere maintain that if the Supreme Court lets the lower court’s decision stand in Lozman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm by Stefan Passantino
By Stefan Passantino The United States Supreme Court has recently announced that it might be revisiting its uber-controversial opinion Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
 As Matthew Fletcher and Wenona Singel have shown, the taking of Native children in the twentieth century was led by states. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
DouglasElliman, by nonparties Matthew George and Michael Moran, was also the broker of thesellers, Stephan Van Dam and Gail Pellett. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In blue New York State, where I live and work, since even before the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 1:07 pm
WHETHER THE RECORD OF THE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ORDERED PURSUANT TO UNITED STATES v. [read post]