Search for: "ONLY A MILE v STATE"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,659
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Imaging, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:57 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an attorney with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania in the firm's civil litigation and labor and employment law practice groups. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:17 am
The case cite is Almeda Mall, L.P. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
So the agreement was actually only for the life of the 2000 administration? [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:27 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an attorney with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania in the firm's civil litigation and labor and employment law practice groups. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
Joseph Abbey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
US law has also protected geographic indications through common law trade mark law without need for a registration ( the "Cognac" case - Institut National Des Appellations v Brown-Forman Corp (TTAB 1998)).However, when it comes to produce and products which are of such strong cultural and heritage state significance like the New Mexico chile, it is the state's government that usually applies for a certification mark. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
” See: Gomes v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:21 am
On June 1, 2011, in Peconic Surgical Group, P.C. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
If you Google Too Big to Sue, you will get a bunch of stories about Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
In the second, Garcia-Lopez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 10:49 pm
In the second, Garcia-Lopez v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
Trahan failed to meet that burden, the manifest error standard, as stated in Lewis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:13 am
v=h-8PBx7isoM Almost 14 million views! [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
Of course, under United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
Pool Offshore, Inc., 182 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1999) was still good law in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Stewart v. [read post]
