Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1981 - 2000 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Reference is made to T 1819/07, where the following is stated under point 3.2 of the reasons:“... average particle sizes (more precisely: mean particle diameters) such as the arithmetic mean diameter (or count mean diameter) ð, the volume or mass mean diameter ðv and the mean surface area diameter ðs are among the most commonly used quantities for describing the average diameter of a particle population (...). [read post]
13 May 2008, 6:00 am
We don't know what that title means; we just wanted to draw some mathematicians to our blog.Well, no.Actually, we just read United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:09 pm by Kenneth Anderson
I read with interest Justice Thomas' dissent in Noriega v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
[The following piece was sent to us by a reader. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
  We need to think about subject access beyond the standard, familiar hierarchical “subjects” that we have come to use in our existing taxonomies, indexing, and classification systems. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Because of the exceptional nature of UJ, federal courts can only use it when the precise conduct in question has clearly been made universally cognizable. [read post]