Search for: "Parker v. Parker."
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,563
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 8:59 am
Parker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
In Cross v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:27 pm
All claims TwIqballed (technically only "Twomblyed," since Iqbal wasn't decided yet) due to: failure to plead facts concerning damages (device).Parker v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm
In non-nomination news: The cross in the Mojave dessert that was at the center of the recent Supreme Court decision in Salazar v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:00 am
As expected, BP is moving to stay federal court lawsuits pending a transfer to the Multi-district Litigation (MDL).Here is a motion filed Friday in Parker v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:18 am
If there is an IP licence, a liquidator might describe it as an onerous licence and disclaim it [says the IPKat, on a recent dispute involving this area, see Butters v BBC here]. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:42 am
That third issue sounds curiously like Parker v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:31 am
In Parker v Seixo [2010] EWHC 90162 (costs), which concerned the legal costs of a road traffic accident claim, the Court found that it should not consider the reasonableness of an After-The-Event insurance policy premium where the underwriter was better placed to rate the financial risk faced by the insurer and where there was no expert evidence to suggest that the ATE premium was unreasonable. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:31 am
In Parker v Seixo [2010] EWHC 90162 (costs), which concerned the legal costs of a road traffic accident claim, the Court found that it should not consider the reasonableness of an After-The-Event insurance policy premium where the underwriter was better placed to rate the financial risk faced by the insurer and where there was no expert evidence to suggest that the ATE premium was unreasonable. [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:27 pm
Parker, 2000 BCSC 1605 at para. [read post]
4 May 2010, 4:40 am
Parker et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:01 am
One case (Parker v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:01 am
One case (Parker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:43 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Appleby, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 926 (29 April 2010) Jones, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 925 (29 April 2010) Kazantzis, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 712 (16 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RW v SW [2010] EWCA Civ 457 (29 April 2010) Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 (29 April 2010) McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) Parker v Secretary of State for… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:06 am
Kurowski v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:15 am
Largely following its precedent from 2001, Brennan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Gene Parker of Hattiesburg [correction: Vicksburg] represented Forrest General. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Parker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Video Software Dealers Association and Ortiz v. [read post]
