Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,254
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2009, 6:26 am
People v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
Davis in Baldwyn, Miss., was not returned. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
18 Feb 2009, 7:52 am
People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
One example emerged in the hearings during Kitzmiller v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 2:05 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 6:07 am
See Davis, 732 N.W.2d at 182. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Bryant, although the internet citation of Ashmore v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:48 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:05 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
Verrilli is the lawyer who journeyed to Duluth but failed to convince Judge Davis to adopt a "making available" right in Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
There was no emergency, but the lack of an emergency doesn't make a statement testimonial under Davis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Bursac v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
The "law and society" scholars of the 1960s, did have Phd's (in many cases) and solid social science tool kits, but they were largely based outside of law schools and only penetrated in a few distinct schools (Wisconsin, Berkeley, Buffalo, Denver, Miami, perhaps a few others).Empirical LawyeringAs I argued in a UC Davis Law Review article on the 40th anniversary of Katz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Pietrangelo v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
To do so would be a continuation of putting the 'foxes in charge of the henhouse'.Please also make sure the White House is aware of Judge Davis's remarks in Capitol v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Conte v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 8:24 am
Ruling of the Court: In Birke v. [read post]
