Search for: "People v. Gay"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
See also, e.g., Hernandez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
She accused colleagues of showing discriminatory attitudes towards her and towards trans people in general, and also singled out a large number of news and comment articles which she regarded as being critical of or hostile to trans people. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Some people oppose LGBTQ+ rights, trying to keep gays and lesbians from the equality our laws promise. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
I admire the survivors who spoke up to convict Nassar, but also realize they suffered so long because of the constant gender harassment that Hill describes in this book.Hill notes that too often, Black and Brown girls, lesbian, gay, trans, queer, and bisexual people are both abused and ignored more often than Whites. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
"] Ilya Shapiro, as many of you know, was suspended and investigated by the Georgetown law school—where he had been about to start a job as a lecturer and as executive director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution—for tweeting the following about the Ketanji Brown Jackson nomination: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
Gays and lesbians would be free to marry; religious objectors would generally be free not to personally facilitate those marriages in ways they considered sinful. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
" pjblack.me/MmlTyS and nor should there be: "'No plans' to close police Facebook page" pjblack.me/Laj3TT #lwb480 #kkb175 "Stranded in the Technological Dark Ages: Implications of the Full Federal Court’s decision in NRL v Optus" pjblack.me/LaiLwc #lwb486 "Surface by Microsoft" pjblack.me/Lae0mu wow surface does look pretty good: "Live from Microsoft's 'major announcement'… [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 3:29 pm
., those cases where "reasonable people" can legitimate disagree on the legal analysis)? [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
There are very real and distressing reasons why gay-bashing is commonly associated with physical violence and death. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:32 am
By Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column discusses last week's SCOTUS decision in Filarsky v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
This is yet another illustration of how some people seem to take leave of their senses when using social media. [read post]
19 May 2007, 2:17 am
Darby and Wickard v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
One example emerged in the hearings during Kitzmiller v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
Seems to me that the "beyond the commerce power" ship sailed sixty-eight years ago with the case of Wickard v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:13 am
The fact that Mr Vaz is a married man who is said to engage in gay sex with prostitutes does not, of itself, justify publication. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
