Search for: "People v. Mix" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm by Larry Catá Backer
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
We’ve warned before that plaintiffs’ experts and peer review don’t mix, and this is a good example. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
If they think they're going to fool people with this, they are badly mistaken. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But the mix of discarded coal and rocks is a carbon-intensive fuel. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The ability to crunch numbers—mix databases including those that have existed for many years. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
One state court held (by a 5–4 vote) that those statutes themselves violate the First Amendment when applied to newspaper reporters or editors.[7] But in AP v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 3:06 pm
Most people would never notice it, would not understand it, and after all, not that many people are exactly Rosa Parks types who stand up to authority figures who are about to hold their lives in their hands. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 7:15 am by Evan Bernick
The 1848 language summarizes the holding of Lynch v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
"We conclude that there does exist a sufficient link," noting that in Loving v. [read post]
16 May 2025, 7:42 am by Techdirt
As a reminder, the Supreme Court’s ruling in last year’s Moody v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
After nearly three-and-a-half hours of oral arguments today, it appeared that the results could be mixed for Trump. [read post]