Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 178,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2010, 3:19 pm
That’s awfully close [...] [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
A hearing was held on the issue of plaintiff’s untimely disclosure of the new expert. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONL-V v S. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 4:14 pm
Furthermore, Plaintiff’s application for a freestanding sign was properly denied regardless of the propriety of the ban on off-premise signs and billboards, and regardless of its proposed size because Village ordinances limited each property to one freestanding sign: which the Plaintiff already had. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:12 pm
At trial the Plaintiff’s damages were assessed at $78,897 less 30% to reflect the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:18 am
… Continue reading "New York Federal Court Denies Class Certification Due To Rule 23(a)(4) Adequacy Requirement Based On Employer’s Strong Defense To Plaintiff’s Individual Claims" [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 10:14 pm
The video also showed that the runner was bunched and torn after the plaintiff’s fall, which supported the plaintiff’s testimony that she “caught her foot on something. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:00 pm
Upon CAB’s applications, the DOB issued building permits for a major alteration at the subject property. the Supreme Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the DOB’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
Defendant had not tried to find out why Amazon kept reinstating Plaintiff’s listing. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:51 pm
Further, Plaintiffs cannot conclude whether that person spoofed the IP address, is the subscriber of that IP address, or is someone else using that subscriber’s Internet access. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 7:10 am
Though plaintiff’s complaint sought $125,000 in compensatory damages, the trial court ultimately only awarded her $5,000, stating that the award was “based on the lack of expert testimony that this was a permanent disability, or expert testimony that [plaintiff’s] pain would last for a lifetime, as well as the fact that there was no damage done to [plaintiff’s] vehicle. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:51 am
On the one hand, it appears to be the plaintiff’s burden to file the case in a proper venue. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:05 am
., Nov. 3, 2015), a Connecticut trial court held that while the 1st Amendment does not immunize the Hartford Roman Catholic Diocese from liability in connection with clergy sexual abuse claims, nevertheless plaintiff here failed to allege adequate facts to support his negligence and breach of fiduciary duty claims against the Diocese:Doe's claims ... do not allege a reasonably foreseeable risk of harm giving rise to a duty owed by the diocese to Doe. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:08 pm
This afternoon, Judge Terry Green granted the plaintiff's summary judgment motion in a case challenging the constitutionality of AB 979. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 3:36 pm
He emphasized that materiality remains an essential requirement for invocation of the fraud-on-the-market theory presumption of reliance and that absent materiality “plaintiffs cannot establish Basic’s fraud-on-the-market presumption. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:38 pm
The trial court granted the resort’s motion for summary judgment, and the plaintiff appealed. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
The case was dismissed based upon the court’s finding that the Plaintiff had presented altered documents and had a friend falsely claim that she was the Plaintiff’s wife in an effort to secure a recovery on a loss of consortium claim. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
On appeal, the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary disposition, arguing that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by governmental immunity under the Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA), and there was no question of fact regarding whether he acted in a grossly negligent manner. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
On appeal, the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary disposition, arguing that the plaintiff’s claim was barred by governmental immunity under the Governmental Tort Liability Act (GTLA), and there was no question of fact regarding whether he acted in a grossly negligent manner. [read post]
19 May 2009, 11:51 am
Mervyn's, LLC (2006) 39 Cal.4th 223, 227. [read post]
