Search for: "Powers v. Ohio" Results 1981 - 2000 of 2,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Author
Reading Article II through the lens of what I call “democratic constitutionalism,” I propose to resolve many of the Constitution’s ambiguities regarding the separation of powers in ways that advance checks and balances and enhance Congress’s capacities to structure, regulate, and oversee the exercise of executive power. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
You must stand tall and use your constitutional powers to fight this war against enemies foreign and domestic while you are still President and Commander-in-Chief. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
” Risks of Scale: Systemic Risk and Concentration of Economic Power The potential for stablecoin arrangements to scale rapidly, another primary benefit noted by industry participants, is deemed to raise significant issues related to systemic risk and concentration of economic power. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:20 am by Jeff Gamso
an op-ed Turow wrote back in 2000 shortly after the Supremes decided Dickerson v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 3:55 pm by Tatiana Venn
Judicial Watch is on the case and has filed (and will file) multiple open records requests and other court actions to expose and try to stop this dangerous abuse of power. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
’ For example, in its interpretation of article V, “A person’s right to use a library should not be denied or abridged because of origin, age, background, or views,” the ALA grounds this right in a democracy’s requirement of an informed citizenry. [read post]