Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2018, 3:34 pm
Co. __ P.3d __ (Cal. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:41 pm
As a result, the loan servicing records (Exhibits D through G) come in as admissible for the truth of what is shown on them. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:30 pm
Miles Medical Co v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 1:39 pm
Here, unlike in Watts v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 5:49 am
Here: Arizona Public Service Co Brief Navajo Transitional Energy Company, LLC Brief United States Brief Navajo Nation Amicus Reply [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:29 am
In 1803, the United States Supreme Court held in Marbury v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:34 am
Some of the RFP cases are high-profile, most notably, Garza v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
Regards, Eric Goldman Professor of Law and Co-Director, High Tech Law Institute Santa Clara University School of Law Lyrissa B. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm
, Kavanaugh joined an opinion holding that a police reserve officer’s emails to his superiors, in which he cc’d his co-workers, were not protected under the balancing test adopted by the Supreme Court in Pickering v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:04 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), is instructive. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
And (2) to what extent should the regulation of corporations be left to the market, to private ordering (contract law) among corporate stakeholders, or to public regulation by the state? [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:43 am
Cardozo’s majority opinions in Steward Machine Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:02 am
Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968). [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
