Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 6,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 10:03 am
In issuing its order, the court stated “an order restricting the flow of information to a state agency, or curtailing a state agency’s ability to fulfill its statutory mandate, cannot rest on catchy phrases or naked assertions devoid of factual support. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:46 pm
" In Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
United States (1989), United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Michigan In Johnson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
This is not the 30 foot unguarded pit of Lugo v Ameritech. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm
The American Constitution Society’s Indianapolis Chapter hosted a discussion of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:35 am
Area School Dist. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 12:51 pm
USDA, and 11-1384 Colorado Mining Association v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am
But with the case hanging in the balance, and the Supreme Court’s decision last year overturning Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 227 Unsolicited Advertisement Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 10:30 am
Fadwa Hammoud is the solicitor general of the state of Michigan, which joined an amicus brief on behalf of the petitioner in June Medical Services v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
The article has been cited in papers submitted to the United States Supreme Court in the upcoming case of Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:34 am
The Court also granted in part the prosecutor’s motion for rehearing in People v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 2:55 pm
Virginia; the decision struck down the state of Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 12:14 pm
CCH's State Tax Review has mention of the Supreme Court's being asked to resolve the "physical presence" controversy encountered by many states in determining whether the Constitution's commerce clause permits imposing corporate income and franchise taxes on companies which have no physical presence in the state.At issue are two 2006 cases on separate petitions, Lanco v New Jersey Dept. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:04 am
(MCL 500.3115(1)(a); Pioneer State Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Baby Girl (OT 2012) Michigan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 10:26 am
Baby Girl (OT 2012) Michigan v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:07 am
In People v Kilpatrick, defendant Kwame Kilpatrick challenged the constitutionality of the Michigan statute that allowed the trial court to enter an order requiring that all proceeds from the sale of his book be placed in escrow to pay restitution to the city of Detroit. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
The Court of Appeals then found that Litzinger’s affidavit stated that the `recovery of [the Mueller] images [would] establish that Robert John Mueller is responsible for producing o [read post]
