Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 14,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:23 am
Notable Events of the Week: “President Biden warned President Vladimir V. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Revisiting the SEC’s Proxy Advisor Rule Posted by Paul Rose and Christopher J. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
Since the Alice v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
From Borkowski v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 11:27 am
Other State RIAs. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:27 am
Other State RIAs. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Table 2: Federal judicial decisions (votes) in 2020 presidential election cases In a Georgia case, the district judge (a 60-year-old George W. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard 9th November 2021 FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
“[A]nnually report[s] to Congress on cybersecurity threats and issues facing the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 11:03 am
NFTs on top (“smart contract” [misnomer] w/ metadata pointing to content file). [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 8:59 am
” State Bank of Lake Zurich v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 2:50 am
IndiaP v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm
SharePatel v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm
North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers & State Employees v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 5:22 am
As relevant here, “Judiciary Law § 487 permits recovery of treble damages in a civil action against an attorney who intentionally deceives the court or a party during the pendency of a judicial proceeding” (Lavelle-Tomko v Aswad & Ingraham, 191 AD3d 1142, 1147 [2021]) or who “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (Judiciary Law § 487 [2]). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm
Sanborn, W. [read post]
