Search for: "STANFORD v. STATE"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am
For the Symposium on Mary Anne Franks, The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019).In her new book, The Cult of the Constitution, Mary Anne Franks argues that the Constitution is a document of white male supremacy. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
Michael Klausner and Jason Hegland of Stanford Law School detailed in a guest post on this blog (here), since 2009, a significantly larger number of securities class action lawsuits (both in terms of absolute numbers of lawsuit filings and in terms of percentage of all lawsuits filed) are now being filed by a group of small plaintiffs’ firms that were not previously active in filing securities lawsuits. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Toronto : Emond Montgomery Publications, 2010 v, 157 p. ; 28 cm. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am
v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
That is more the function of state Supreme Court judges dealing with issues of state constitutional, statutory and common law, and even they are frequently constrained by federal constitutional law and federal preemption of state law. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:09 pm
Fisher, a law professor at Stanford. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
21 Nov 2005, 1:03 pm
What is less understood, however, is how the new law could hurt the entire United States economy, and consequently, the financial wellbeing of all Americans. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
What began as an exploratory brainstorm at the Stanford Generative AI and Law Workshop[7] became active and ongoing solicitations of input from legal and technical experts across a spectrum of industry verticals; and eventually, evolving to a formalized set of guiding principles.[8] The outcomes of the initial report demonstrated that existing responsibilities of legal professionals (e.g. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
