Search for: "Scott v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am
The government need only demonstrate that the surveillance targets “persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States” and seeks “foreign intelligence information. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
The LSC argued it was, citing R (Corner House Research) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2005] EWCA Civ 192 and, of course, Weaver v London Quadrant Housing Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 235 (our report here). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Nothing binds the United States to the rest of the world, and we need not adhere to the same set of rules that we demand others apply. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Justice John Paul Stevens explained his standpoint clearly in a dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
Whatley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:40 pm
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is doing in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:31 am
However, the President or Congress can exercise considerable powers at ports of entry to the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:58 am
I then had a fascinating conversation with a leadership coach, born in the United States, but whose parents are from India. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
United States that the evacuation order was legal. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
James Pohl’s April 25 ruling denying defendant Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s defense motion to dismiss in United States v. al-Hawsawi; the legal weight of reports that “major combat operations” have concluded in Iraq; and the contours of Defense Secretary Jim Mattis’s report on the future of detainee policy, among others. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:26 am
— Scott Greenfield (@ScottGreenfield) June 27, 2018 Serving their members? [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
” Based on the historical pedigree of qui tam statutes in England and the United States, the Supreme Court upheld qui tam informers’ standing in Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Mary Welek Atwell, Sexual Harassment in the United States: Analyzing the Hostile Environment (2020). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:47 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, granted city’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
An adventurous soul, Sharon took numerous camping trips and road trips across the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 1:51 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, recently was called on to interpret an insurance policy and to determine whether or not the facts of a claim implicated coverage in the policy at issue. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 am
That happened in 2013, when the Court read its decision in United States v. [read post]
