Search for: "Slate v State"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
CCPA’s sales restrictions raise First Amendment concerns In Sorrell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
V. [read post]
14 May 2021, 6:07 am
Hardiman, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Saturday, May 8, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Director liability, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Nevada, Securities litigation, State law March to the Beat of Your Own Drummer: Amazon’s Executive Compensation Practices Posted by Howard Berkower, McCarter & English LLP, on Sunday, May 9, 2021 Tags: Amazon, Equity-based… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am
While the Supreme Court in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:08 pm
By way of background, the Decrees emerged out of the landmark 1948 Supreme Court antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 9:27 am
Even though it could be done at no cost to the state. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:20 am
With this claim, Trump seeks to expand Nixon v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 12:04 pm
In return for agreeing to a system that could (in Spotify’s own internal language) increase amounts paid to rights holders for their music, the slate would be wiped clean for past infringement after the new system for obtaining rights went into effect. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:08 pm
By way of background, the Decrees emerged out of the landmark 1948 Supreme Court antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
See Sherwood v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:57 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
” The evidence produced at the June 16 hearing of the House Select Committee established both John Eastman’s proposal–for the Vice President to either reject the electoral votes from the states that submitted alternate uncertified slates of electors or to suspend the joint session an [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
State regulations often are more strict. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
It permitted his state-law claims to go forward to trial, however. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
Berger v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 5:30 am
Google doesn't want you to limit its ability to follow you around the internet http://t.co/9vYzPQjxcK -> RT @eurorights: 'French blogger owes $2,000 in damages for review 'too prominent' on Google'. http://t.co/UHMDvye7hC -> RT @thenetmonitor: Putin signs law that could end up blocking Facebook and Twitter in Russia http://t.co/gXCDBlKZps -> RT @PrivacyDigest: 26 Questions EU Regulators Want Google to Answer – Digits – WSJ http://t.co/wx2qjD1yBp ->… [read post]
