Search for: "Small v. People" Results 1981 - 2000 of 7,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2010, 12:45 am by Indefensible
Thanks to my old colleague Frank for passing this to me:Some Excerpts from United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am by Susan Brenner
He also had a small office where individuals brought their computers for repair. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
She learned she was pregnant just days before the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Amy Howe
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Recently, during the oral argument in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am by Robert Brammer
In 1868, the Court of Common Pleas heard the case of Chorlton v Lings where, as was feared by some MPs, it was argued that the Interpretation Act 1850 provided the term “man” in the Representation of the People Act 1867 “shall be deemed and taken to include females … unless the contrary is expressly provided” and meant that women who otherwise met the eligibility requirements could vote. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:14 am
Does the new name, which has now been firmly established in the minds of most people, really make any difference or is it a bit pointless? [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]