Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 2,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
He pressed a federal government lawyer to say whether “the United States takes the position today” that “the sovereignty and dignity of Georgia is less than the sovereign dignity of Ohio, and that of Alabama less than that of Michigan? [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 10:25 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama's Southern Division handed down a decision on April 20, 2009 in the Vicki V. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
A “covered jurisdiction” could be an entire state, or a county, city or other governmental unit at the local level. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
In Gentry v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 4:23 pm
In Gentry v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 7:45 am
Paul Horwitz (University of Alabama School of Law) has posted Demographics and Distrust: The Eleventh Circuit on Graduation Prayer in Adler v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:32 am
The embattled peremptory challenge got no help from the United States Supreme Court today in Rivera v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
Perkins, 748 F.2d 1519, 1533 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:35 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:32 am
Docket: 08-567 Title: Agripost, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:37 am
" United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:01 pm
at *15 (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was enacted with… [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:44 am
United States, 431 U. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
United Steel, etc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:27 pm
Massey Coal Co. case pending before the United States Supreme Court and they have done so without even reading my brief. . . . [read post]
