Search for: "State v. Argus "
Results 1981 - 2000
of 85,028
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 11:01 am
Respondent argued that she had a good‑faith belief that the United States was I.A. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 7:35 pm
The case, Dalzell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Whitford, Husted v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
But conservatives argue that each state should get a single vote at the convention, with delegates selected by the state legislatures. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:17 pm
Defendant argues applicable law requires proof that defendant moved to a new address in California, not to an address out of state. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:42 pm
Feldman wrote a 1,900 word column arguing that Scalia would have rejected the independent state legislature doctrine, but did not mention that Scalia joined the opinion that endorsed that doctrine. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
Federal preemption has long been a hot button issue in pharmaceutical drug cases, with consumer advocates arguing that drug companies should be held to the sometimes higher state standards. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:37 am
In Stein v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:21 am
A recent decision handed down by the state's high court in Washington v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, arguing that the defendants were entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 8:53 pm
While most are familiar with Batson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 1:33 pm
See, Waterman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
The Alliance argues that if K-V is placed in a position to control the market, “it can be expected to resume such price gouging. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
“That analysis allows a pragmatic or functional assessment that accords some latitude to the States. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
Geren and Kiyemba v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:28 am
Texas, the white defendant argued that the State of Texas violated his 6th Amendment rights under Batson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 7:47 am
I have argued in an earlier post that the secrecy of information relevant to a civil or criminal court case creates serious problems under Article 6 ECHR and/or Article 14 ICCPR, but that it could potentially be justified if all possible steps short of disclosure are taken in order to alleviate the consequences for any trial of – reasonably ordered – classifications of information.I return to this because the English Court of Appeal has yesterday (again) spoken on the issue,… [read post]
