Search for: "State v. Back" Results 1981 - 2000 of 42,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2009, 2:57 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has just ruled in Kerr v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:44 pm by Staff
REDUCED TO PETTY OFFENSE – Possession of Marijuana in a Federal Facility, State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:59 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Back on September 10, I had a long post criticizing some dicta in a wiretapping opinion by Judge Easterbrook: The Perils of Interpreting Statutes With Multiple Remedial Schemes: A Comment on the Dicta in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:03 am
There was a similar challenge made in the federal courts regarding marriage equality back in 1972, just five years after the Loving v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:14 am by Taylor Gillan
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Wednesday handed down its ruling in Yates v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:41 am
  These were the last of five defendants charged in a cash back at closing mortgage fraud scheme in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
JOIN TODAY -- FREE MEMBERSHIP   Circle Game in Federal Courts Has Lawsuit Sent Back to FINRA's Barred DoorDaniel Callahan, et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:03 am
There was a similar challenge made in the federal courts regarding marriage equality back in 1972, just five years after the Loving v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 10:55 am by clineassoc
By Jim Cline and Peter Haller In Andrade v City of Milwaukee, the Wisconsin State Supreme Court ruled that a police officer fired for making racist comments on Facebook was not entitled to getting his job back because of an alleged pre-termination due process violation. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
Reinstatement following termination pursuant to §73 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Hoover v County of Broome, 23 Misc 3d 1134(A)Keith Hoover sued Broome County, seeking a court order annulling the County’s decision to “terminate his employment” pursuant to Civil Service Law §73,* and compelling his reinstatement with back salary and employment benefits.Although not so stated in the decision, [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:03 am
There was a similar challenge made in the federal courts regarding marriage equality back in 1972, just five years after the Loving v. [read post]