Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 22,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 6:57 am
Field, 612 F.Supp. 2d 660 (2009) and Costar Realty Information, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 10:04 am
In so holding, the Ninth Circuit was simply recognizing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier this year in Standard Fire Insurance v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:57 pm
I don’t know of any cases specifically on this, but I think this has to be unconstitutional: A state may no more seize federal property than tax the Bank of the United States, see M’Culloch v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:48 am
Group v Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske, P.C., 151 AD3d 527, 528 [1st Dept 2017], lv dismissed 32 NY3d 1196 [2019]; compare Dormitory Auth. of the State of N.Y. v Samson Constr. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:47 am
The post Pay-if-Paid v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:40 am
First, the Supreme Court of Florida stated the issue presented related to the burden of proof in a negligence action. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
See The State of Louisiana, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
Excerpt: [Washington v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:10 pm
Meacham v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 11:14 am
In a recent Findlaw essay, Marci Hamilton discusses the recently issued Ninth Circuit en banc opinion in Navajo Nation v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:19 pm
Inc. v New York State Dept. of Audit & Control, 2009 NY Slip Op 29071, Decided on February 20, 2009, Supreme Court, Albany County, Platkin, J. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:42 am
It places enormous burdens on the centers, even though California has not provided any evidence suggesting that the centers are actually causing any harm, and it applies to all pregnancy centers, even if they are not doing anything misleading. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:11 am
” Graves v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
“When jurisdiction is challenged by a nonresident defendant, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to demonstrate that sufficient ‘minimum contacts’ exist between the defendant and the forum state to justify imposition of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:26 am
See Laitram Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:20 am
The 9th grants relief to petitioner because the state (Washington) instruction on accomplice liability was ambiguous, and this with other factors unconstitutionally relied the state of its burden. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 8:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
I have just received a copy of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s first Memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps regarding the United States Supreme Court’s decision earlier today in Bilski v. [read post]
