Search for: "State v. D. H." Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 3:00 pm
State of Indiana - Appellant was charged with Battery, a Class D Felony and Resisting Law Enforcement, a Class A Misdemeanor. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Dennis Crouch
These Wands factors include: (A) the breadth of the claims; (B) the nature of the invention; (C) the state of the prior art; (D) the level of one of ordinary skill; (E) the level of predictability in the art; (F) the amount of direction provided by the inventor; (G) the existence of working examples; and (H) the quantity of experimentation needed to make or use the invention based on the content of the disclosure. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
OHMI (Class 46) TOPCOM : Likelihood of confusion: Häfele v OHIM – Topcom Europe (Class 46) EXECUTIVE EDITION can be freely used: BSH v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
On 4 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the case of D v Persons Unknown [2021] EWHC 157 (QB). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]