Search for: "State v. Harris"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 5,749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The claims were issued on 6 October 2022 by Hamlins Solicitors on behalf of six individuals: Baroness Doreen Lawrence; Prince Harry; Sir Elton John and David Furnish; Elizabeth Hurley; and Sadie Frost. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:08 am
The Texas ruling is one of many to arise after the 2021 court ruling Dobbs v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:46 pm
Harris v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
The Ohio state prison where Mr. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:30 am
cacaroot / iStock / Getty Images Plus In a 7-2 decision, the Court found the states challenging the ACA’s legality in California v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
The point of departure in the argument in Egbert v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:15 am
In another bit of case law, Ward v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
The United States, as incarnated in its Chief Executive and as articulated in his State of the Union, suggests this process of aging. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 2:38 am
Harris, _F.3d _ (7th Cir. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:05 am
Twelve years after Congress enacted PLRA, the courts are still untangling its meaning.The case is Harris v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
This holding is consistent with our decision in Harris v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
This holding is consistent with our decision in Harris v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:01 pm
I once got in an argument with a group over whether or not some states still executed prisoners by firing squad. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:36 pm
Harris (C.D. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:31 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:11 pm
On Appeal from the 295th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2015-76112. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
Recently, in EEOC v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:32 am
With the United States Supreme Court ruling in Missouri v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
Twitter has subsequently filed a motion to quash the subpoena stating that the Harris court had misinterpreted its terms and conditions and that its members certainly owned their tweets and content. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
Twitter has subsequently filed a motion to quash the subpoena stating that the Harris court had misinterpreted its terms and conditions and that its members certainly owned their tweets and content. [read post]
