Search for: "State v. Liberty"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 10,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 4:11 am
Correction officers may be sued by prisoners seeking money damages for alleged violations of 42 USC §1983 rights in state supreme courtHaywood v Drown et al, Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York, USSC No. 07-10374.Decided May 26, 2009New York's Correction Law §24 provides that New York State's trial courts of general jurisdiction cannot entertain §1983 suits filed by prison inmates seeking money damages from… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:05 am
Supreme Court could help rein in the administrative state by overruling Auer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:35 pm
UPDATE: In United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
The state's taking away someone's liberty, so we want to make sure we're doing the right thing. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:00 pm
Just recently, in Riley v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
It hasn't.But this still doesn't prove that Article 4 (3) (b) affirmatively puts the recognition of conscientious objection at the liberty of contracting States. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:05 am
According to the civil liberties group:The government relies on a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Texas, as well, to the states. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:37 pm
Jarkesy v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 11:25 pm
Yesterday the Florida Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:28 pm
Shaygan's liberty at unnecessary risk and violated their moral obligation to the accused. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am
This morning the Court issued its decision in the GPS tracking case United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 3:53 am
TpB points to United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
From Bilski v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
From Bilski v. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 7:33 am
United States v. [read post]