Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
On the other hand the House of Lords in Scandecor Developments AB v Scandecor Marketing AB seemed rather inclined to validate bare licensing. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
Moohan & Anor v The Lord Advocate, heard 24 July 2014. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:55 pm
Resolving the conflict Mostyn J had taken the view in EBK v DLO (above) at [101] that “if a defendant in proceedings governed by FPR Part 37 or COPR Part 21 is found to have committed a contempt then that defendant must be named in open court and in general terms the court must state what is the nature of the contempt of court and what punishment, if any, has been imposed. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Brownstein, Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:05 pm
Elenis and Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
, (Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2010).Richard Schragger, The Relative Irrelevance of the Establishment Clause, (Texas Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 583, 2011).Mary Szto, Strengthening the Rule of Virtue and Finding Chinese Law in 'Other' Places: Gods, Kin, Guilds, and Gifts, (February 21, 2011).Ryan Keith Bach, The Lord Giveth: Christian 'Health Insurance', the Role of State Insurance Regulation, and the Aftermath of Kentucky v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am
Lord Justice Lewison referred to the case of Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2018] 1 WLR 643 where the phrase “grounds which appear to the court to be substantial” was considered but in the context of insolvency proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:38 pm
In one recent case, Bollea v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
An example of this was last year’s case of Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No 2) a case which involved British teachers employed by the British government to work in an international (not British) enclave. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am
Back in 2000 in the House of Lords case White v White, Lord Thorpe stated that the calculation is ‘a tool not a rule’. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
OBG Ltd et al v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
The Court will determine whether the Supreme Court should depart from the judgment of the House of Lords in James Buchanan & Co. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:22 am
In Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946; [2005] EWCA Civ 75, Lord Phillips of Worth Matraver MR (pic) giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, found that a defamation claim could be struck out as an abuse of process if it did not disclose that “a real and substantial tort” had been committed within the jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
In a written judgment, the Lord Ordinary found the applicant's claims to be unfounded and unspecified.# The applicant appealed to the Inner House. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
Indeed, not dissimilar to Lord Mance’s emphasis on the Claimant’s family life in the Supreme Court case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd in the context of privacy claims, the judgment in AXB v BXA serves to illustrate that the Court will continue to place great emphasis when the Claimant’s family members, in particular spouses and young children, are also plainly adversely affected by both the Defendant’s course of conduct and the publicity that… [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
See also Lord Lester’s Bill, clause 12. (2) Rule out some claimants? [read post]
