Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 19,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Already, LLC d/b/a YUMS v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
Worse for Comphy, the court characterizes the Comphy word mark as descriptive and not commercially strong because the word mark isn’t heavily advertised to consumers. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:06 am
Speaking for the unanimous Court, Rothstein J. stated: “In order for the owner of a registered trade-mark to have exclusive use of the trade-mark throughout Canada, there cannot be a likelihood of confusion with another trade-mark anywhere in the country. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am
Mark D. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 9:18 pm
Minneapolis police arrest author-blogger-gun rights activist Joel Rosenberg [Popehat, Mark Bennett, Scott Greenfield] In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
Marks, No. 05-30218 (6-13-08). [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
A spokesperson for LVMH welcomed the move, stating that French ruling protects consumers from becoming a victim due to the “illicit use of trade marks”. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 11:16 am
In Grand Canyon West Ranch v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
↑ Thaler v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
In addition, even though the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of likelihood of confusion, it also concluded that the district court erred in adopting a rule excluding any consideration of a senior user’s post-infringement use of the mark and erred in certain aspects of its analysis, including how the court weighed strength of the mark and Bacardi’s intent (Lodestar Anstalt v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court provided minimal guidance on interpretation of plurality decisions in Marks v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:42 am
The Manual further states that for a colour mark to be registerable“The key issue will usually be whether the proprietor has used the mark distinctively to educate the public that it is a trade mark. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
PTY Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:55 am
But in 1990, the Court struck down that law as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:32 am
Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 7:21 pm
A spokeswoman for V&S stated, "The reason for this is that we consider there is a risk of confusion. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:04 am
It's Flynn Pharma Ltd v Drugsrus Ltd and Tenolol Ltd [2015] EWHC 2759 (Ch), a 6 October 2015 decision of Mrs Justice Rose sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
Eureka Chemical Company v. [read post]
