Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
State Farm, 187 Cal. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of Georgia-Pacific (GP) West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
Image via WikipediaThe North Carolina Court of Appeals in Mark Ward v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court provided minimal guidance on interpretation of plurality decisions in Marks v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:30 am
Boston Red Sox Baseball Club Limited Partnership v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal BoardTopics include:"tacking" - backward, forward; judge v. jury (Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:03 pm
Mark v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:18 am
As the Supreme Court itself noted, there was a marked trend in state legislatures 'toward liberalization of abortion statutes.' That movement for legislative change ran parallel to another law revision effort then underway — the change from fault to no-fault divorce regimes, a reform that swept through the state legislatures and captured all of them by the mid-1980s. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:51 am
Mark "Argentina Wanderer" Sanford as the Palmetto State's most embarrassing elected official. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
In the trademark opposition case, Halo Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
In the trademark opposition case, Halo Trademarks Limited v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm
Pan American Bank of Hialeah, 383 So.2d 256, 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding mutuality of obligation is essential to the formation of a bilateral contract); Mark Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
PTY Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 9:43 am
Baby-v-Crib-Complaint [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:56 pm
The IPKat continues to receive correspondence concerning Case C-181/09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v IPN Bulgaria OOD, a reference for a preliminary ruling on European trade mark law from the Sofiyski gradski sad (Bulgaria) which the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Fifth Chamber) declared to be "manifestly inadmissible". [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:42 am
The Manual further states that for a colour mark to be registerable“The key issue will usually be whether the proprietor has used the mark distinctively to educate the public that it is a trade mark. [read post]
