Search for: "State v. Person" Results 1981 - 2000 of 76,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 8:44 am
The judge refused to dismiss the claims against the individual defendants based on the language of the FMLA regulations, which state that "any person who acts directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer to any of the employees of such employer" may qualify as an employer under the law. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:41 am by Jeff Gittins
The Court noted that the Utah Water Code provides that a "person aggrieved by an order of the state engineer may obtain judicial review. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLP By Michele Haydel Gehrke In a decision significant for employers with Bring Your Own Device (“BYOD”) policies, a California Court of Appeal held in Cochran v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 3:29 am by Marcus Evans (UK) and Rosie Nance
Where risk of this is “non-existent or insignificant” the Advocate General stated that pseudonymised data can fall outside the definition of personal data. [read post]