Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 1981 - 2000 of 4,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 3:51 am
Disqualifying applicants for a particular job EEOC v Woodbridge Corp., CA8, 263 F.3d 812Mathews v The Denver Post, CA10, 2001 WL 967797 The Woodbridge and Mathews cases concern similar issues: disqualifying an individual with a disability for a particular job or assignment. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Bridgestone opposition two tyred, fell flat | Public interest in Plant Variety Rights. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Making sense of trade mark conflict in the EUTM systemKatfriend Darren Meale reports on the CJEU decision Continental Reifen Deutschland v Compagnie generale des etablissements Michelinwhich upheld tyre giant Continental’s appeal against Michelin, concerning their stylised registered mark ‘X’.The challenge of protecting a database without a sui generis right, this time from SingaporeKat friends Lau Kok Keng, Nicholas Lauw and Jiamin Leow report on… [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
| Blackcurrant, public interest and the first ever compulsory licensing application at the Community Plant Variety Office? [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:17 am by Ray Mullman
Don’t blame trial lawyers and create a false dichotomy of “business v. lawyers. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:48 am by Eliana Baer
This can been seen from the Appellate Division’s February decision in the case of Wonderlin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
  In addition to her knowledge of plant biology, Bristol claimed the ability to tell whether tea had been added to milk, or the tea poured first and then milk had been added. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm by Schachtman
  In addition to her knowledge of plant biology, Bristol claimed the ability to tell whether tea had been added to milk, or the tea poured first and then milk had been added. [read post]