Search for: "State v. Poole" Results 1981 - 2000 of 3,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2012, 12:51 pm by N. Peter Rasmussen
The 2nd Circuit found that a lead plaintiff seeking to represent investors in 17 securities offerings had standing to sue Goldman Sachs based on several securities offerings backed by residential mortgage pools originated by several banks and mortgage companies. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s a story about this very thing from California, from Borgstrom v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 12:35 pm by Florian Mueller
And Motorola's argument that an ex ante (before standardization) perspective on FRAND rates is not acceptable runs counter to Judge Posner's position on FRAND royalties in Apple v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am by Michael Rosman
  It is obviously a crucial part of Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
 As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
    New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the key attorneys in the NY v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:30 pm by Lewis Lazarus
Lazarus This article was originally published in the Delaware Business Court Insider | September 5, 2012 Since Kahn v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am by Jeff Marshall
    (4) In the case of a resident who has not been adjudged incompetent by the State court, any legal-surrogate designated in accordance with State law may exercise the resident's rights to the extent provided by State law. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:51 pm by Editorial Board
 On August 24,  two summonses with notice were filed in New York state court against DB Structured Products, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 5:53 am by Jim von der Heydt
 I also proposed that there is an enormous amount of work to do to understand the nature of Justice Roberts' restraint in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  The appellate court stated that the appeal was premature and could be raised after a final determination of the defendants' guilt or innocence. [read post]