Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 1981 - 2000
of 13,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
The State "remains immune from negligence claims arising out of governmental functions such as police protection unless a special relationship with a person creates a specific duty to protect, and that person relies on performance of that duty" (Price v New York City Hous. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: Cook v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
June 20, 2012) (By Order only, Judge Gelb denies request to bifurcate Post-Koken case for trial).Price v Price, Auto Glass Unlimited & State Farm, No. 13625 of 2010(C.P. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:10 pm
Town of Hallie v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:39 pm
Augusto Supreme Indecision: Costco v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am
By way of example, the state passage rate for the July 2009 New York State bar exam was 72%. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:14 am
Am. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Third party challengers can seemingly inflict stock-price drop through an efficient patent invalidation mechanism provided at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, while betting against the targeted company’s stock price. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:18 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
v Pennsylvania P.U.C. et al. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:52 pm
Mawji v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:14 am
So, where do we even begin with Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:55 pm
For example, the court recently approved Dow Jones' change to WSJ online pricing, finding that plaintiff did not state a claim for breach of contract since the contract allowed for a change in terms: "No Breach of Contract Claim from Mid-Stream Change of WSJ Online Pricing. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:52 am
As discussed in previous blog posts, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Petitioner Halliburton’s argument to modify or overturn the fraud-on-the market presumption that the Court first articulated more than a quarter century ago in Basic v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
Thus, for example, at the time of the creation of the RRS and the RNWF, "A deputy finance minister, Dmitry V. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:39 pm
This Article elaborates upon that argument and situates it within the particular context of the case of United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
AU Optronics Corp., in which the Court will clarify the authority of state governments to sue in state courts to protect their residents from alleged price fixing; Kent Scheidegger also covers the Rosemond grant at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
